Skip to main content

Table 4 Overview of the quality assessment of studies using SIGN, Drummond and Cochrane criteria

From: A systematic review of economic evaluation of healthcare associated infection prevention and control interventions in long term care facilities

Authors

OVERALL

Quality

High

Moderate

Low

Campbell et al. (33)

77·05%

14·66%

8·29%

Moderate quality

Church et al. (28)

53·67%

24·83%

21·50%

Low quality

Hutton et al. (31)

82·01%

13·21%

4·78%

High quality

Lee et al. (34)

65·30%

8·12%

26·59%

Moderate quality

Li et al. (32)

85·04%

5·09%

9·87%

High quality

Marchand et al. (27)

82·81%

11·93%

5·26%

High quality

Salmerón et al. (35)

48·88%

20·22%

30·89%

Low quality

Sansone & Bravo (36)

55·73%

16·41%

27·86%

Low quality

Trick et al. (29)

60·81%

9·87%

29·31%

Moderate quality

Verma et al. (30)

96·49%

1·75%

1·75%

High quality