Authors | Health Measure (outcomes of intervention) | Intervention | Control | Incremental cost (E) | Incremental effect or incremental benefit (F) | Incremental cost-savings (G) | Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (H) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cost of intervention (A) | Outcomes (effects or benefits) of intervention (B) | Cost of control (C) | Outcomes (effects or benefits) of control (D) | E = A-C | F = B-D | F in $ | G = absolute (F in $) – absolute (E) | H = (F/E) * 104 (in health measure/$) | H = (F in $/E) * 104 | |||
Campbell et al. (33) | Strategy 3 testing | $124,800,000 | $67,800,000 | $57,000,000 a | $113,300,000 a | -$56,300,000 | $19,877·19 a | |||||
Strategy 3 + Strategy 1 + Status Quo testing | $203,700,000 | $135,900,000 a | $218,000,000 a | -$82,100,000 | $16,041·21 a | |||||||
Church et al. (28) | Duration of influenza outbreak (days) | $69·52 | 9 a | $98·55 | 16 a | -$29·03 | -7 a | 2,411·30 a | ||||
Hutton et al. (31) | CAUTI events | $139,948 | 15·5 | $173,986 | 24·2 | -$34,038 | -8·7 | -$15,136 | -$18,902 a | 2.56 a | $4,446·79 a | |
Hospitalisation due to CAUTI events | 6·8 | 9·7 | -2·9 | -$39,180 | -$5,142 a | 0.85 a | $11,510·66 a | |||||
QALYs lost from CAUTI events | 0·35 | 0·55 | -0·2 | |||||||||
Total | 54,316 | $20,278 | -$15,957·45 a | |||||||||
Lee et al. (34) | Number of CRE Infections | All facilities eligible | $303,300,000 | 2,896 | $325,500,000 | 3186 | -$22,200,000 a | -290 a | 0·13 a | |||
Geographic constraint | $298,400,000 | 2,853 | -$27,100,000 a | -333 a | 0·12 a | |||||||
Number of CRE-Attributable Deaths | All facilities eligible | $303,300,000 | 348 | 383 | -$22,200,000 a | -35 a | 0·02 a | |||||
Geographic constraint | $298,400,000 | 343 | -$27,100,000 a | -40 a | 0·01 a | |||||||
QALYs Lost | All facilities eligible | $303,300,000 | 3,679 | 4,049 | -$22,200,000 a | -370 a | 0·17 a | |||||
Geographic constraint | $298,400,000 | 3,626 | -$27,100,000 a | -423 a | 0·16 a | |||||||
Li et al. (32) | LYs gained | Xpert | $162 | 11·1952 | $121 | 11·1907 | $41 | 0·0045 | 1·1 a | |||
CXR | $168 | 11·1942 | $47 | 0·0035 | 0·74 a | |||||||
LTBI/TB screening | $430 | 11·2003 | $309 | 0·0096 | 0·31 a | |||||||
QALYs gained | Xpert | $162 | 11·1702 | 11·1634 | $41 | 0·0068 | 1·66 a | |||||
CXR | $168 | 11·1687 | $47 | 0·0053 | 1·13 a | |||||||
LTBI/TB screening | $430 | 11·1792 | $309 | 0·0158 | 0·51 a | |||||||
Marchand et al. (27) | Cases of TB predicted (conversion rate 0.6%) | $6,100 | 0·52 | $3,204 | 1·28 | $2,896 | -0·76 | -2·62 a | ||||
TB-related deaths predicted (conversion rate 0.6%) | 0·24 | 0·55 | -0·31 | -1·07 a | ||||||||
Cases of TB predicted (conversion rate 0) | $5,965 | 0·52 | $2,283 | 0·95 | $3,682 | -0·43 | -1·17 a | |||||
TB-related deaths predicted (conversion rate 0) | 0·21 | 0·40 | -0·19 | -0·52 a | ||||||||
Salmerón et al. (35) | PCR and quarantines avoided | $14,753·5 | ||||||||||
Sansone and Bravo (36) | UTI rate per quarter | $23,125 | 2·3% | $33,907 | 3·3% a | -$10,782 a | -1% a | 0·01 a | ||||
Trick et al. (29) | MRSA case patients’ percentage among those at risk | $2,415 | 20% | $6,066 | 18% | -$3,651 a | 2% a | -0·05 a | ||||
ESBL KP case patients’ percentage among those at risk | 10% | 17% | -7% a | 0·19 a | ||||||||
ESBL EC case patients’ percentage among those at risk | 15% | 11% | 4% a | 0·11 a | ||||||||
VRE case patients’ percentage among those at risk | 6·8% | 8·1% | -1·3% a | 0·04 a | ||||||||
Verma et al. (30) | Cases/1000 entrants - LTBI screening | $202,822 | 4·6 | $124,416 | 5·3 | $78,405 | -0·7 a | -0·000009 a | ||||
Cases/1000 entrants - Active TB screening | $655,649 | 4·5 | 5·3 | $531,233 | -0·8 a | -0·000002 a |