Skip to main content

Table 4 Baseline regression results

From: Does privatization decrease the structural efficiency in the Chinese hospital sector?

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

VARIABLES

RE

AAE

ATE

AEARE

AERAE

RGDP

-0.070b

-0.052

-0.035

0.052

0.029

 

(-2.10)

(-1.64)

(-1.41)

(1.47)

(1.43)

PPH

-0.064

-0.041

-0.062b

-0.137c

-0.072c

 

(-1.53)

(-1.04)

(-2.02)

(-3.33)

(-2.87)

PTH

0.104c

0.010

0.137c

0.170c

0.060b

 

(2.67)

(0.27)

(4.81)

(6.04)

(2.59)

TPD

0.337c

0.002

0.430c

0.290c

0.042

 

(2.67)

(0.02)

(4.63)

(4.32)

(0.56)

GHCP

-0.033

-0.007

-0.035

-0.016

0.089c

 

(-0.92)

(-0.21)

(-1.33)

(-0.89)

(4.11)

PM

0.456a

0.215

0.346a

0.057c

0.253

 

(1.79)

(0.89)

(1.85)

(6.49)

(1.65)

RSU

-0.008

0.007

-0.016

-0.105

-0.004

 

(-0.15)

(0.13)

(-0.40)

(-1.57)

(-0.11)

Constant

-0.857

0.132

-0.360

0.295

-1.464a

 

(-0.61)

(0.10)

(-0.35)

(1.19)

(-1.81)

Observations

310

310

310

310

310

R-squared

0.155

0.142

0.281

0.354

0.279

code FE

YES

YES

YES

NO

YES

year FE

YES

YES

YES

NO

YES

Number of id

31

31

31

31

31

  1. The regressions in the above table include RE, AAE, ATE, and AERAE as explanatory variables to study the role of the degree of marketisation on them. The focus is on the regression coefficients and significance of the degree of marketisation (PPH)
  2. YSE indicates that fixed effects were controlled, NO indicates that fixed effects were not controlled
  3. t-values in parentheses
  4. a, and cdenote statistical significance at the 10 per cent, 5 per cent and 1 per cent levels, respectively