Skip to main content

Table 11 Heterogeneity regression results for east, central and west regions

From: Does privatization decrease the structural efficiency in the Chinese hospital sector?

 

East

Central

West

VARIABLES

AEARE

RGDP

0.080a

0.031

-0.012

 

(1.74)

(1.44)

(-0.26)

PPH

-0.016

-0.117b

-0.040

 

(-0.25)

(-2.51)

(-1.38)

PTH

-0.025

0.024

0.104c

 

(-0.44)

(0.53)

(3.14)

TPD

0.596b

-0.268b

-0.027

 

(2.00)

(-2.20)

(-0.22)

GHCP

0.155c

0.014

0.010

 

(3.50)

(0.38)

(0.18)

PM

1.173c

-0.395a

-0.254

 

(3.99)

(-1.86)

(-0.60)

RSU

0.050

-0.012

0.004

 

(0.91)

(-0.23)

(0.06)

Constant

-9.218c

2.737c

1.686

 

(-4.78)

(2.71)

(0.99)

R-squared

0.493

0.655

0.335

Number of id

11

9

11

code FE

YES

YES

YES

year FE

YES

YES

YES

  1. Column 1 shows the results for the non-eastern region, column 2 shows the results for the central region, and column 3 shows the results for the western region. The regression results can be found that the regression coefficients of PPH in the central region are significant, while the results in the eastern and western regions are not significant, which suggests that the effect of the degree of marketisation of the healthcare sector on the mismatch of healthcare resources is more significant in the central region
  2. YSE indicates that fixed effects were controlled, NO indicates that fixed effects were not controlled
  3. t-values in parentheses
  4. a, b and c denote statistical significance at the 10 per cent, 5 per cent and 1 per cent levels, respectively