| Non-coastal | Coastal |
---|
VARIABLES | AEARE |
RGDP | 0.035a | 0.050 |
| (1.68) | (1.00) |
PPH | -0.064c | -0.034 |
| (-2.64) | (-0.49) |
PTH | 0.107c | -0.017 |
| (4.41) | (-0.27) |
TPD | -0.043 | 0.646b |
| (-0.58) | (2.10) |
GHCP | 0.082c | 0.123b |
| (3.32) | (2.57) |
PM | -0.246 | 1.169c |
| (-1.34) | (3.83) |
RSU | -0.011 | 0.047 |
| (-0.22) | (0.89) |
Constant | 0.962 | -8.431c |
| (1.18) | (-4.26) |
Observations | 200 | 110 |
R-squared | 0.324 | 0.419 |
Number of id | 20 | 11 |
code FE | YES | YES |
year FE | YES | YES |
- Column 1 shows results for non-coastal areas and column 2 shows results for coastal areas. The regression results can be found that the regression coefficients of PPH in non-coastal areas are significant while those in coastal areas are not significant, which indicates that the effect of the degree of marketisation of the healthcare sector on the mismatch of healthcare resources is more significant in non-coastal areas
- YSE indicates that fixed effects were controlled, NO indicates that fixed effects were not controlled
- t-values in parentheses
- a, b and c denote statistical significance at the 10 per cent, 5 per cent and 1 per cent levels, respectively