Skip to main content

Table 1 Model inputs and variances: base-case and sensitivity analyses

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of dupilumab among patients with uncontrolled severe asthma using LIBERTY ASTHMA QUEST Korean data

Parameter

Value in the base case

Value in DSA, lower/uppera

PSA distribution used

Sources

Analysis setting

 Start age (year)

51.9

40.1–63.7

Normal

Mean age in the Korean population from QUEST trial [13]

 Time horizon

Lifetime

   

Response and treatment persistence

 Proportion of responders for dupilumab

0.857

0.686–1.000

Beta

Post-hoc analyses of QUEST trial for the Korean population [13]

 Annual long-term discontinuation rates for dupilumab

0.107

0.089/0.125

Gamma

Post-hoc analyses of QUEST trial for ITT population [5]

Transition probability

 Transition probabilities between disease-related sub-states

Detailed in Additional file 1: Table S1

 

Dirichlet

Post-hoc analyses of QUEST trial for the Korean population [13]

 Relative effect of experiencing a severe exacerbation beyond the trial period for dupilumab

1.350

1.155–1.545

Log-normal

Published data [14]

 Fatality rate for severe exacerbation

0.049

0.039–0.058b

Beta

Published data using national health insurance claims data by HIRA [18]

Proportions of the exacerbation treatment settings

  

Dirichlet

Administrative medical database from the hospital

 Office visit

0.524

   

 ED visit

0.143

0.114, 0.171b

  

 Hospitalization

0.333

0.267, 0.400b

  

Utility weights

 Utility for control-related states without exacerbation

  

Beta

Post-hoc analyses of QUEST trial for the Korean population [13]

  Controlled asthma

0.907

0.811/1

  

  Uncontrolled asthma

0.795

0.653/0.937

  

 Utility increment for treatment-related states

  

Normal

Post-hoc analyses of QUEST trial for the Korean population [13]

  Dupilumab (all patients)

 + 0.023

-0.100/0.146

  

  Dupilumab (responders)

 + 0.039

-0.083/0.161

  

 Disutility for exacerbation-related statesc

  

Normal

Post-hoc analyses of the QUEST trial for the ITT population [5]

  Moderate exacerbation

-0.125

-0.135/-0.115

  

  Severe exacerbation – Office visit

-0.161

-0.176/-0.146

  

  Severe exacerbation – ED visit

-0.164

-0.290/-0.038

  

  Severe exacerbation – Hospitalization

-0.186

-0.311/-0.061

  

Duration with exacerbations (days)

  

Gamma

Post-hoc analyses of QUEST trial for the ITT population [5]

 For “Add-on dupilumab”

  Moderate exacerbation

17.2

16.4/18.0

  

  Severe exacerbation – Office visit

14.4

13.7/15.1

  

  Severe exacerbation – ED visit

13.2

10.0/16.4

  

  Severe exacerbation – Hospitalization

18.5

16.0/21.1

  

 For “Background therapy alone”

  Moderate exacerbation

16.6

16.1/17.1

  

  Severe exacerbation – Office visit

18.0

17.2/18.7

  

  Severe exacerbation – ED visit

20.2

17.4/23.0

  

  Severe exacerbation – Hospitalization

28.0

22.0/34.1

  
  1. CI Confidence interval, DSA Deterministic sensitivity analysis, ED Emergency department, HIRA Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, PSA Probabilistic sensitivity analysis, SE Standard error
  2. aIn DSA, the parameters were varied using 95% CIs or SE based on the data sources
  3. bThe source for parameter values did not report SEs or CIs; therefore, it was assumed that the SE was equivalent to 20% of the mean
  4. cWith the disutility approach, the utility associated with exacerbations was determined by applying a disutility to the utility value in the “controlled asthma” state