From: Economic analysis of digital motor rehabilitation technologies: a systematic review
Author | Number of studies | Country | Illness | Objective | Patient characteristics |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wagner et al., 2011 | 1 | USA | Patients with moderate to severe motor impairment of the upper limbs, caused by stroke, admitted to a center 6-months after stroke | Determine the additional cost of robot-assisted therapy and tested its cost-effectiveness | Male, n (%): RT: 47 (96) ICT:48 (96) UC: 27 (96) Female, n (%): RT: 2 (4) ICT: 2 (4) UC: 1 (4) Total: 127 Age, Mean (SD) RT: 66(11) ICT:64 (11) UC: 63 (12) |
Hesse et al.,2014 | 2 | Germany | Supratentorial stroke patients (hemorrhagic or ischemic) | Evaluate the cost-effectiveness and the effectiveness of RAGT versus IAT to restore the motor function in the moderately to severely affected patient after stroke | Male, n (%): RAGT+IAT: 13 (52) IAT: 15 (60) Female, n (%) RAGT+IAT: 12 (48) IAT: 10 (40) Total: 50 Age, Mean (SD) RAGT+IAT: 71.4 (15.5) IAT: 69.7 (16.6) |
Stefano et al., 2014 | 3 | USA | Patients with stroke-induced upper limb impairment, acute or subacute hemiparetics. Shoulder, elbow or wrist muscle groups (patients with acute (< or =1 week of onset), unilateral, ischemic embolic, or thrombotic stroke) | To compare the costs of such therapy to the control therapies used in the NeReBot clinical trials run thus far | Male, n (%): RT: 9 (64.29) UC: 6 (75) Female, n (%) RT: 5 (35.71) UC: 2 (25) Total:22 Age, Mean (SD) RT: 72.4 (7.1) UC: 75.5 (4.8) |
Lloréns et al., 2016 | 4 | Spain | Chronic Outpatient with stroke with residual hemiparesis | - To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a VRT program in the balance recovery of individuals with hemiparesis after stroke in comparison with an in-clinic program. - To compare the subjective experiences - To contrast the costs of both programs. | Male, n (%): VRT: 10 (66.7) Control: 7 (46.7) Female, n (%) VRT: 5 (33.3) Control: 8 (53.3) Total:30 Age, Mean (SD) VRT: 55.47(9.63) Control: 55.60(7.29) |
Bustamante Valles et al., 2016 | 5 | Mexico | Hemiplegic patients in chronic phase secondary to stroke | To develop and deliver an effective and cost and labor cost-effectiveCost-effective method of poststroke rehabilitation that encouraged continued rehabilitation and was more or as effective as traditional physical and occupational therapy approaches | Male, n (%): RG: 3 (30) Control:4 (40) Female, n (%) RG: 7 (70) Control: 6 (60) Total:20 Age, Mean (SD) RG: 44.1(12.53) Control: 64.1(8.38) |
Housley et al., 2016 | 6 | USA | Stroke survivors with unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within the previous 24 months | To examine the efficacy of using a home-based, tele robotic-assisted device to: improve functional ability, reduce depression symptoms, and create a satisfactory experience, increase access to, and monitor participant utilization of cost-effective rehabilitation compared to the cost of clinic-based therapy for rural stroke survivors | Male, n (%):19 (95) Female, n (%):5 (5) Total: 20 Age, Mean (SD) VRT: 55.47(9.63) Control: 55.60(7.29) |
Adie et al., 2017 | 7 | UK | Patients with weakness following a stroke with the previous six months | Evaluate the efficacy of using the WiiTM to improve affected arm function after stroke | Male, n (%): WiiTM: 66 (56.41) CT: 65 (53.39) Female, n (%) WiiTM: 51 (43.59) CT: 53 (46.61) Total: 235 Age, Mean (SD): WiiTM: 73.1(5.8) Usual care: 73.0(5.5) |
Islam and Brunner, 2019 | 8 | Denmark, Norway, and Belgium | Patients with unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within the 3 first months after suffering a stroke | To explore cost considerations of VR training in stroke | Male, n (%): VRT: 42(68) C6T: 35 (60) Female, n (%) VRT: 20 (32) CT: 23 (40) Total=120 Age, Mean (minimum-maximum) VRT: 62 (23–89) CT: 62 (41–87) |
Prvu Bettger et al., 2020 | 9 | USA | Patients with TKA | To examine costs and clinical noninferiority of a VPT program compared with traditional PT care after TKA | Male, n (%): VPT: 61(40.40), UC: 53 (34.60) Female, n (%): VPT: 90 (59.60) UC: 100 (65.40) Total:304 Age, Mean (SD) VPT: 65.40 (7.7) Control: 65.1 (9.2) |
Rémy-Néris et al., 2021 | 10 | France | Patients aged 18 to 80 years, 3 weeks to 3 months poststroke with a FM Assessment score of 10 to 40 points | To determine differences in cost utility between the two interventions at D30 and M12 | Male, n (%): Exo group: 73(67.59) Control:67(62.62) Female, n (%): Exo group: 35(32.42) Control:40(37.38) Total:215 Age, Mean (SD): Exo group: 73(67.59) Control:67(62.62) |
Fernandez-Garcia et al., 2021 | 11 | UK | Patients with moderate or severe upper limber functional limitation from first-ever stroke | To determine whether RAT is cost-effective compared with an EULT programme or usual care | Male, n (%): RAT: 156 (61%) EULT:159 (61%) Control: 153 (60%) Female, n (%): RAT: 101 (39%) EULT: 100 (39%) UC: 101 (40%) Total:770 Age, Mean (SD): RAT: 59.9 (13.5) EULT: 59.4 (14.3) UC: 62.5 (12.5) |