Skip to main content

Table 1 Study characteristics based on country, type of illness, objective and study population

From: Economic analysis of digital motor rehabilitation technologies: a systematic review

Author

Number of studies

Country

Illness

Objective

Patient characteristics

Wagner et al., 2011

1

USA

Patients with moderate to severe motor impairment of the upper limbs, caused by stroke, admitted to a center 6-months after stroke

Determine the additional cost of robot-assisted therapy and tested its cost-effectiveness

Male, n (%):

RT: 47 (96)

ICT:48 (96)

UC: 27 (96)

Female, n (%):

RT: 2 (4)

ICT: 2 (4)

UC: 1 (4)

Total: 127

Age, Mean (SD)

RT: 66(11)

ICT:64 (11)

UC: 63 (12)

Hesse et al.,2014

2

Germany

Supratentorial stroke patients (hemorrhagic or ischemic)

Evaluate the cost-effectiveness and the effectiveness of RAGT versus IAT to restore the motor function in the moderately to severely affected patient after stroke

Male, n (%):

RAGT+IAT: 13 (52)

IAT: 15 (60)

Female, n (%)

RAGT+IAT: 12 (48)

IAT: 10 (40)

Total: 50

Age, Mean (SD)

RAGT+IAT: 71.4 (15.5)

IAT: 69.7 (16.6)

Stefano et al., 2014

3

USA

Patients with stroke-induced upper limb impairment, acute or subacute hemiparetics. Shoulder, elbow or wrist muscle groups (patients with acute (< or =1 week of onset), unilateral, ischemic embolic, or thrombotic stroke)

To compare the costs of

such therapy to the control therapies used in the NeReBot

clinical trials run thus far

Male, n (%):

RT: 9 (64.29)

UC: 6 (75)

Female, n (%)

RT: 5 (35.71)

UC: 2 (25)

Total:22

Age, Mean (SD)

RT: 72.4 (7.1)

UC: 75.5 (4.8)

Lloréns et al., 2016

4

Spain

Chronic Outpatient with stroke with residual hemiparesis

- To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of a VRT program in the balance recovery of individuals with hemiparesis after stroke in comparison with an in-clinic program.

- To compare the subjective experiences

- To contrast the costs of both programs.

Male, n (%):

VRT: 10 (66.7)

Control: 7 (46.7)

Female, n (%)

VRT: 5 (33.3)

Control: 8 (53.3)

Total:30

Age, Mean (SD)

VRT: 55.47(9.63)

Control: 55.60(7.29)

Bustamante Valles et al., 2016

5

Mexico

Hemiplegic patients in chronic phase secondary to stroke

To develop and deliver an effective and cost and labor cost-effectiveCost-effective

method of poststroke rehabilitation that encouraged

continued rehabilitation and was more or as effective as

traditional physical and occupational therapy approaches

Male, n (%):

RG: 3 (30)

Control:4 (40)

Female, n (%)

RG: 7 (70)

Control: 6 (60)

Total:20

Age, Mean (SD)

RG: 44.1(12.53)

Control: 64.1(8.38)

Housley et al., 2016

6

USA

Stroke survivors with unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within the previous 24 months

To examine the efficacy of using a home-based, tele robotic-assisted device to: improve functional ability, reduce depression symptoms, and create a satisfactory experience, increase access to, and monitor participant utilization of cost-effective rehabilitation compared to the cost of clinic-based therapy for rural stroke survivors

Male, n (%):19 (95)

Female, n (%):5 (5)

Total: 20

Age, Mean (SD)

VRT: 55.47(9.63)

Control: 55.60(7.29)

Adie et al., 2017

7

UK

Patients with weakness following a stroke with the previous six months

Evaluate the efficacy of using the WiiTM to improve affected arm function after stroke

Male, n (%):

WiiTM: 66 (56.41)

CT: 65 (53.39)

Female, n (%)

WiiTM: 51 (43.59)

CT: 53 (46.61)

Total: 235

Age, Mean (SD):

WiiTM: 73.1(5.8)

Usual care: 73.0(5.5)

Islam and Brunner, 2019

8

Denmark, Norway, and

Belgium

Patients with unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within the 3 first months after suffering a stroke

To explore cost considerations of VR training in stroke

Male, n (%):

VRT: 42(68)

C6T: 35 (60)

Female, n (%)

VRT: 20 (32)

CT: 23 (40)

Total=120

Age, Mean (minimum-maximum)

VRT: 62 (23–89)

CT: 62 (41–87)

Prvu Bettger et al., 2020

9

USA

Patients with TKA

To examine costs and

clinical noninferiority of a VPT program compared with

traditional PT care after TKA

Male, n (%):

VPT: 61(40.40),

UC: 53 (34.60)

Female, n (%):

VPT: 90 (59.60)

UC: 100 (65.40)

Total:304

Age, Mean (SD)

VPT: 65.40 (7.7)

Control: 65.1 (9.2)

Rémy-Néris et al., 2021

10

France

Patients

aged 18 to 80 years, 3 weeks to 3 months poststroke with a FM Assessment score of 10 to 40 points

To determine differences in cost utility between

the two interventions at D30 and M12

Male, n (%):

Exo group: 73(67.59)

Control:67(62.62)

Female, n (%):

Exo group: 35(32.42)

Control:40(37.38)

Total:215

Age, Mean (SD):

Exo group: 73(67.59)

Control:67(62.62)

Fernandez-Garcia et al., 2021

11

UK

Patients with moderate or severe upper limber functional limitation from first-ever stroke

To determine whether

RAT is cost-effective

compared with an

EULT programme or usual care

Male, n (%):

RAT: 156 (61%)

EULT:159 (61%)

Control: 153 (60%)

Female, n (%):

RAT: 101 (39%)

EULT: 100 (39%)

UC: 101 (40%)

Total:770

Age, Mean (SD):

RAT: 59.9 (13.5)

EULT: 59.4 (14.3)

UC: 62.5 (12.5)

  1. D30 30th day, EULT Enhanced Upper Limb Therapy, FM Fugl Meyer, IAT Individual Arm Therapy, ICT Intensive Comparison Therapy, M12 Twelfth month, NeReBot Neuro-Rehabilitation-Robot, PE Physical Exercise, PT Physical Therapy, RAGT Robot-Assisted Gait Therapy, RAT Robot-Assisted Therapy, RT Robot Therapy, SD Standard Deviation, TKA Knee Arthroplasty, UC Usual Care, UK United Kingdom, USA United States of America, USD United States Dollars, VA Veterans Affairs, VPT Virtual Physical Therapy, VRT Virtual Realty-based Telehabilitation, WiiTM Wii Sports