Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 7 Robustness of the results

From: How did medicaid expansions affect labor supply and welfare enrollment? Evidence from the early 2000s

Dependent variable

Neighboring states

High-poverly counties

No time trend

Clustering at state-level

Labor force participation rate - Post2*Treated

−1.16**

−1.19***

−1.24**

−1.23**

(0.54)

(0.45)

(0.58)

(0.61)

Average weekly hours - Post2*Treated

−0.29**

−0.24**

−0.31**

−0.28**

(0.014)

(0.012)

(0.015)

(0.013)

Log (weekly wages)-Post2*Treated

0.012**

0.013**

0.014*

0.010**

(0.006)

(0.007)

(0.008)

(0.005)

Log (food stamp enrollment)-Post2*Treated

0.0045**

0.0042**

0.0047**

0.0043**

(0.0022)

(0.0020)

(0.0023)

(0.0021)

County demographics

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

County fixed-effects

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

County-specific time trend

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

N

2604

651

1232

1232

R2

0.45

0.47

0.44

0.46

  1. Standard errors are clustered by county except for last column and given in parantheses. *indicates p < 0.10, **indicates p < 0.0 ***indicates P < 0.01