Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Model III and Model IV estimation of young people's preferences for integrated FP and HIV outreach services

From: Designing a package of sexual and reproductive health and HIV outreach services to meet the heterogeneous preferences of young people in Malawi: results from a discrete choice experiment

 

Model III (GMXL-Correlated)

Model IV (GMXL WTP-Space)

 

Coefficient

SE a

StdD a,b

SE a,b

Coefficient

SE a

StdD a,b

SE a,b

Random Design Parameters

        

Provider Age (Older)

−0.228**

0.111

0.198*

0.104

−17.45

14.25

7.98

10.48

Provider Gender (Female)

0.146

0.101

0.034

0.082

−16.18

16.30

20.93

14.81

Confidential Service

2.609***

0.275

2.042***

0.118

441.10***

47.83

309.80***

29.56

HCT and ART Available

0.611***

0.146

0.844***

0.096

161.36***

25.927

163.70***

20.47

Sports for Youth

0.952***

0.267

0.655***

0.165

65.27*

35.40

60.07*

35.90

Music and Drama

−0.282

0.260

0.711***

0.209

−6.43

39.55

59.33*

31.76

Health Talk

0.395*

0.238

0.622***

0.226

60.30

36.82

52.06**

21.56

Price

−0.006***

0.001

0.008***

0.001

    

Price in preference space form

    

−0.01***

0.002

0.01***

0.001

Fixed Parameter

        

Alternative Specific Constant

−2.529***

0.059

  

−2.67***

0.067

  

Price in WTP-Space

    

1

   

Interaction Terms

        

Prov. Older: Resp. Female

0.088

0.115

  

13.34

16.20

  

Prov. Older: Resp. Older

−0.095

0.124

  

−8.43

18.13

  

Prov. Older: In Relationship

−0.070

0.118

  

7.45

16.50

  

Prov. Female: Resp. Female

−0.098

0.106

  

−18.91

15.64

  

Prov. Female: Resp. Older

−0.011

0.103

  

−1.26

15.47

  

Prov. Female : In Relationship

0.060

0.107

  

7.05

17.07

  

Confidentiality: Resp. Female

−0.476***

0.179

  

−4.45

21.41

  

Confidentiality: Resp. Older

−0.317*

0.172

  

−15.18

20.26

  

Confidentiality: In Relationship

0.850***

0.204

  

57.14**

23.64

  

HIV Services: Resp. Female

0.160

0.141

  

26.28

25.13

  

HIV Services: Resp. Older

−0.285**

0.144

  

−9.04

24.41

  

HIV Services: In Relationship

0.416***

0.159

  

4.68

25.54

  

Sports: Resp. Female

−0.424*

0.233

  

−25.85

25.44

  

Sports: Resp. Older

0.282

0.254

  

25.92

33.24

  

Sports: In Relationship

−0.092

0.257

  

−15.47

29.60

  

Music: Resp. Female

0.146

0.262

  

16.67

39.14

  

Music: Resp. Older

−0.278

0.296

  

−14.87

43.58

  

Music: In Relationship

0.212

0.252

  

19.93

40.58

  

Health Talk: Resp. Female

−0.220

0.252

  

16.45

39.99

  

Health Talk: Resp. Older

−0.164

0.261

  

−12.81

41.12

  

Health Talk: In Relationship

−0.110

0.257

  

−6.37

43.69

  

Price: Resp. Female

−0.001

0.001

  

−0.17

0.11

  

Price: Resp. Older

0.001

0.001

  

−0.03

0.10

  

Price: In Relationship

0.002**

0.001

  

−0.01

0.12

  

Variance parameter in scale (τ)

0.997***

0.067

  

1.37***

0.10

  

Weighting parameter (γ)

0.00041

0.032

  

0

   

Sample mean (σ)

0.976

1.161

  

0.95

1.78

  

Model Fit Statistics

        

Number of individuals

537

   

537

   

Number of observations

6444

   

6444

   

Log Likelihood Function

−3477

   

−3530

   

AIC

7096

   

7187

   

% of responses correctly predicted

62%

   

62%

   
  1. aSE = Standard Error, StdD = Standard Deviation, bOnly for random parameters.
  2. ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05; *p < 0.1.
  3. Likelihood Ratio Test Between Models 3 and 2: LR3–2 = 47.01χ2 2.0.0.001(13.82).
  4. Likelihood Ratio Test Between Models 4 and 3: LR4–3 = 107.19χ2 8.0.0.001(26.125).